Skip to main content

Full text of "The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt"

See other formats


The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt 
an article by Carl Oglesby 



William Shirer closed his 1960 masterpiece, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, with 
the judgment that the Nazi regime "had passed into history, "1 but we cannot be so 
confident today. On the contrary, the evidence as of 1990 is that World War II did not 
end as Shirer believed it did, That Nazism did not surrender unconditionally and 
disappear, that indeed it finessed a limited but crucial victory over the Allies, a victory no 
less significant for having been kept a secret from all but the few Americans who were 
directly involved. 

The Odessa and its MissionHitler continued to rant of victory, but after Germany's 
massive defeat in the battle of Stalingrad in mid-January 1943, the realists of the 
German General Staff (OKW) were all agreed that their game was lost. Defeat at 
Stalingrad meant, at a minimum, that Germany could not win the war in the East that 
year. This in turn means that the Nazis would have to keep the great preponderance of 
their military forces tied down on the eastern front and could not redeploy them to the 
West, where the Anglo-American invasion of Italy would occur that summer. Apparently 
inspired by the Soviet victory, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Prime Minister 
Winston Churchill announced at Casablanca, on January 24, 1943, their demand for 
Germany's unconditional surrender and the complete de-Nazification of Europe. 2 

Within the German general staff two competing groups formed around the question of 
what to do: one led by Heinrich Himmler the other by Martin Bormann.3 Himmler was 
chief of the SS (Schutzstaffel, "protective echelon"), the blackshirted core of the Nazi 
party that emerged as Hitler's bodyguard in the late 1920s and grew into the most 
powerful of the Nazi political institutions. After the failure of the attempted military coup 
of July 20, 1944, which wounded but did not kill Hitler, the SS seized all power and 
imposed a furious blood purge of the armed services in which some seven thousand 
were arrested and nearly five thousand executed. 4 The SS was at that point the only 
organ of the Nazi state. 

Himmler's plan for dealing with the grim situation facing Nazism found its premise in 
Hitler's belief that the alliance between "the ultra-capitalists" of the U.S. and "the ultra- 
Marxists" of the Soviet Union was politically unstable. "Even now they are at 
loggerheads," said Hitler. "If we can now deliver a few more blows, this artificially 
bolstered common front may suddenly collapse with a gigantic clap of thunder."5 
Himmler believed that this collapse would occur and that the U.S. would then consider 
the formation of a new anti-soviet alliance with Nazi Germany. The Nazis would then 
negotiate "a separate peace" with the United States, separate from any peace with the 
USSR, with which Germany would remain at war, now joined against the Soviets by the 
United States. 

But Martin Bormann, who was even more powerful than Himmler, did not accept the 
premise of the separate-peace idea. Bormann was an intimate of Hitler's, the deputy 




fuhrer and the head of the Nazi Party, thus superior to Himmler in rank. Bormann 
wielded additional power as Hitler's link to the industrial and financial cartels that ran the 
Nazi economy and was particularly close to Hermann Schmitz, chief executive of I.G. 
Farben, the giant chemical firm that was Nazi Germany's greatest industrial power. 

With the support of Schmitz, Bormann rejected Himmler's separate-peace strategy on 
the ground that it was far too optioptimistic.6 The Allied military advantage was too 
great, Bormann believed, for Roosevelt to be talked into a separate peace. Roosevelt, 
after all, had taken the lead in proclaiming the Allies' demand for Germany's 
unconditional surrender and total de-Nazification. Bormann reasoned, rather, that the 
Nazi's best hope of surviving military defeat lay within their own resources, chief of 
which was the cohesion of tens of thousands of SS men for whom the prospect of 
surrender could offer only the gallows. 

Bormann and Schmitz developed a more aggressive self-contained approach to the 
problem of the looming military defeat, the central concept of which was that large 
numbers of Nazis would have to leave Europe and at least for a time, find places in the 
world in which to recover their strength. There were several possibilities in Latin 
America, most notably Argentina and Paraguay; South Africa, Egypt, and Indonesia 
were also attractive rear areas in which to retreat.7 

After the German defeat in the battle of Normandy in June 1944, Bormann took the First 
external steps toward implementing concrete plans for the Nazis' great escape. An 
enormous amount of Nazi treasure had to be moved out of Europe and made safe. This 
treasure was apparently divided into several caches, of which the one at the 
Reichsbank in Berlin included almost three tons of gold (much of it the so-called tooth- 
gold from the slaughter camps) as well as silver, platinum, tens of thousands of carats 
of precious stones, and perhaps a billion dollars in various currencies. 8 

There were industrial assets to be expatriated, including large tonnages of specialty 
steel and certain industrial machinery as well as blue-prints critical to the domination of 
certain areas of manufacturing. Key Nazi companies needed to be relicensed outside 
Germany in order to escape the reach of war-reparations claims. And tens of 
thousands of Nazi war criminals, almost all of them members of the SS, needed help to 
escape Germany and safely regroup in foreign colonies capable of providing security 
and livelihoods. 

For help with the first three of these tasks, Bormann convened a secret meeting of key 
German industrialists on August 10, 1944, at the Hotel Maison Rouge in Strasbourg. 9 
One part of the minutes of this meeting states: 

The [Nazi] Party is ready to supply large amounts of money to those industrialists who 
contribute to the post-war organization abroad. In return, the Party demands all financial 
reserves which have already been transferred abroad or may later be transferred, so 
that after the defeat a strong new Reich can be built.10 




The Nazi expert in this area was Hitter's one-time financial genius and Minister of the 
Economy, Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, available to Bormann even though he 
was in prison on suspicion of involvement in the anti-Hitler coup of 1944. According to a 
U.S. Treasury Department report of 1945, at least 750 enterprises financed by the Nazi 
Party had been set up outside Germany by the end of the war. These firms were 
capable of generating an annual income of approximately $30 million, all of it available 
to Nazi causes. 11 It was Schacht's ability to finesse the legalities of licensing and 
ownership that brought this situation about. 1 2 

Organizing the physical removal of the Nazis' material assets and the escape of SS 
personnel were the tasks of the hulking Otto Skorzeny, simultaneously an officer of the 
SS, the Gestapo and the Waffen SS as well as Hitler's "favorite commando. "13 
Skorzeny worked closely with Bormann and Schacht in transporting the Nazi assets to 
safety outside Europe and in creating a network of SS escape routes ("rat lines") that 
led from all over Germany to the Bavarian city of Memmingen, then to Rome, then by 
sea to a number of Nazi retreat colonies set up in the global south. 

The international organization created to accommodate Bormann's plans is most often 
called "The Odessa," a German acronym for "Organization of Veterans of the SS." It 
has remained active as a shadowy presence since the war and may indeed constitute 
Nazism's most notable organizational achievement. But we must understand that none 
of Bormann's, Skorzeny's, and Schacht's well-laid plans would have stood the least 
chance of success had it not been for a final component of their organization, one not 
usually associated with the Odessa at all but very possibly the linchpin of the entire 
project. 

Enter Gehlen 



This final element of the Odessa was the so-called Gehlen Organization (the Org), the 
Nazi intelligence system that sold itself to the U.S. at the end of the war. It was by far 
the most audacious, most critical, and most essential part of the entire Odessa 
undertaking. The literature on the Odessa and that on the Gehlen Organization, 
however, are two different things. No writer in the field Of Nazi studies has yet explicitly 
associated the two, despite the fact that General Reinhard Gehlen was tied politically as 
well as personally with Skorzeny and Schacht. Moreover, Gehlen's fabled post-war 
organization was in large part staffed by SS Nazis who are positively identified with the 
Odessa, men such as the infamous Franz Alfred Six and Emil Augsburg of the 
Wannsee Institute. An even more compelling reason for associating Gehlen with the 
Odessa is that, without his organization as a screen, the various Odessa projects would 
have been directly exposed to American intelligence. If the Counter Intelligence Corps 
(CIC) and the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) had not been neutralized by the 
Gehlen ploy, the Odessa's great escape scheme would have been discovered and 
broken up. 



At 43, Brigadier General Reinhard Gehlen was a stiff, unprepossessing man of pounds 
when he presented himself for surrender at the U.S. command center in Fischhausen. 




But there was nothing small about his ego. "I am head of the section Foreign Armies 
East in German Army Headquarters," he announced to the Gl at the desk. "I have 
information to give of the highest importance to your government." The Gl was not 
impressed, however, and Gehien spent weeks stewing in a POW compound before an 
evident Soviet eagerness to find him finally aroused the Americans' attention. 14 

Gehien became chief of the Third Reich's Foreign Armies East (FHO), on April 1, 1942. 
He was thus responsible for Germany's military intelligence operations throughout 
Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. His FHO was connected in this role with a 
number of secret fascist organizations in the countries to Germany's east. These 
included Stepan Bandera's "B Faction" of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists 
(OUN/B),15 Romania's Iron Guard, 16 the Ustachis of Yugoslavia, 17 the Vanagis of 
Latvia18 and, after the summer of 1942, "Vlassov's Army, "19 the band of defectors from 
Soviet Communism marching behind former Red hero General Andrey Vlassov. Later 
on in the war, Gehien placed one of his top men in control of Foreign Armies West, 
which broadened his power; and then after Admiral Wilhelm Canaris was purged and 
his Abwehr intelligence service cannibalized by the SS, Gehien became in effect Nazi 
Germany's over-all top intelligence chief. 

The Great Escape 

In December 1943, at the latest, Gehien reached the same conclusion about the war 
that had come upon Bormann, Schacht, Skorzeny, and Himmler. Germany was losing 
and could do nothing about it. Several months later, Gehien says, he began quietly 
discussing the impending loss with a few close associates. As he writes in his memoir: 
"Early in October 1944 I told my more intimate colleagues that I considered the war was 
lost and we must begin thinking of the future. We had to think ahead and plan for the 
approaching catastrophe. "21 

Gehlen's strategic response to Gotterdammerung was a kind of fusion of Himmler's 
philosophy with Bormann's more pessimistic Odessa line: "My view," he writes, "was 
that there would be a place even for Germany in a Europe rearmed for defense against 
Communism. Therefore we must set our sights on the Western powers, and give 
ourselves two objectives: to help defend against Communist expansion and to recover 
and reunify Germany's lost territories. "22 

Just as Bormann, Skorzeny, and Schacht were beginning to execute their escape plans, 
so too was Gehien: "Setting his sights on the Western powers," and in particular on the 
United States. Gehien pursued the following strategic rationale: When the alliance 
between the United States and the USSR collapsed, as it was bound to do upon 
Germany's defeat, the United States would discover a piercing need for a top-quality 
intelligence service in Eastern Europe and inside the Soviet Union. It did not have such 
a service of its own, and the pressures of erupting East-West conflict would not give it 
time to develop one from scratch. Let the United States therefore leave the assets 
assembled by Gehien and the FHO intact. Let the United States not break up Gehlen's 




relationship with East European fascist groups. Let the United States pick up Gehlen's 
organization and put it to work for the West, the better to prevail in its coming struggle 
against a Soviet Union soon to become its ex-ally. 

Gehlen brought his top staff people into the planning for this amazing proposal. 
Together, during the last months of the war, while Hitler was first raging at Gehlen for 
his "defeatist" intelligence reports, then promoting him to the rank of brigadier general, 
then at last firing him altogether (but promoting into the FHO directorship one of 
Gehlen's co-conspirators), Gehlen and his staff carefully prepared their huge files on 
East Europe and the Soviet Union and moved them south into the Bavarian Alps and 
buried them. At the same time, Gehlen began building the ranks of the FHO intelligence 
agents. The FHO in fact was the only organization in the whole of the Third Reich that 
was actually recruiting new members as the war was winding down. 23 

SS men who knew they would be in trouble when the Allied forces arrived now came 
flocking to the FHO, knowing that it was the most secure place for them to be when the 
war finally ended. 24 When Gehlen's plans were complete and his preparations all 
concluded, he divided his top staff into three separate groups and moved them (as 
Skorzeny was doing at the same time) into prearranged positions in Bavaria. Gehlen 
himself was in place before the German surrender on May 7, hiding comfortably in a 
well-stocked chalet in a mountain lea called Misery Meadow. Besides Gehlen, there 
were eight others in the Misery Meadow group, including two wounded men and three 
young women. For three weeks, maintaining radio contact with the two other groups, 
Gehlen and his colleagues stayed on the mountain, waiting for the American army to 
appear in the valley far below. 

"These days of living in the arms of nature were truly enchanting," he wrote. "We had 
grown accustomed to the peace, and our ears were attuned to nature's every sound. "25 

Destruction of the OSS 



Gehlen was still communing with nature when William Donovan, chief of the Office of 
Strategic Services (OSS), arrived in Nuremberg from Washington, dispatched by the 
new president to assist Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson. Harry S. Truman had 
made Jackson the United States's chief prosecutor with the International Military 
Tribunal (IMT), established to try the Nazis' principal military leaders. Donovan's OSS 
was to function as an investigative arm of the IMT. 

By the last half of the war if not before, President Roosevelt and Donovan were 
convinced that the U.S. needed a permanent intelligence service and that this service, 
like the OSS, should be civilian rather than military. They were convinced too that the 
OSS should be its foundation. On October 31, 1944, Roosevelt directed Donovan to 
prepare a memo on how such a service should be organized. 26 



Donovan consulted on this assignment with his colleague Allen Dulles, a force unto 
himself as wartime chief of OSS operations in Bern. Dulles advised Donovan to placate 




the military by proposing that the new agency be placed automatically under military 
command in time of war.27 Donovan's proposal incorporated this idea, 28 but only in 
order to state all the more strongly the case for civilian control and for making the OSS 
the basis of the new organization. As he wrote in his memo to Roosevelt of November 
18, 1944, "There are common-sense reasons why you may desire to lay the keel of the 
ship at once.... We now have [in the OSS] the trained and specialized 
personnel needed for such a task, and this talent should not be dispersed. "29 

Donovan proposed establishment of a civilian intelligence service responsible directly to 
the President and the Secretary of State, the chief mission of which would be to support 
the President in foreign policy. Except for the civilian Secretaries of War and the Navy, 
Donovan's plan did not even include a place for military representation on the advisory 
board, and he was careful to specify that the advisory board would merely advise and 
not control. The new service was to be all-powerful in its field, being responsible for 
"coordination of the functions of all intelligence agencies of the Government." The 
Donovan intelligence service, in other words, would directly and explicitly dominate the 
Army's G-2 and the Navy's ONI. 30. 

Naturally, therefore, the Donovan plan drew an intense attack from the military. One G-2 
officer called it "cumbersome and possibly dangerous. "31 Another referred to the OSS 
as "a bunch of faggots. "32 Nor was the FBI's J. Edgar Hoover silent. Hoover had fought 
creation of the OSS perhaps more bitterly than the military and had insisted throughout 
the war on maintaining an FBI intelligence network in Latin America despite the fact that 
this was supposed to be OSS turf. 33 

Certain elements within Army intelligence were not only opposed to Donovan's plan but 
were also beginning to formulate their own notions of what a post-war intelligence 
system should be like. Roosevelt sent the Joint Chiefs of Staff ultra-secret copies of 
Donovan's proposal along with Roosevelt's own draft executive order to implement it. 
On January 1, 1945, the Chiefs formally reported to Roosevelt their extreme 
dissatisfaction with this scheme and leaked Donovan's memo to four right-wing 
newspapers, which leapt to the attack with blaring headlines accusing FDR and 
Donovan of conspiring to create "a super Gestapo." This attack put the Donovan plan 
on hold, and the death of FDR on April 12, 1945 destroyed it. 34 

In early May 1945, president for less than a month, Truman made the OSS the 
American component of the investigative arm of the IMT. It is one of the fascinating 
conjunctions of this story that Donovan should have left for Nuremberg just as Gehlen 
was coming down from his mountain. It is one of its riper ironies that Donovan would 
soon resign from Jackson's staff in a disagreement over trying German officers as war 
criminals, which Donovan objected to but Jackson and Truman supported. 35 

Had Donovan lent his energies to the trial of Nazis within the German officer corps, he 
might have confronted the very adversaries who would shortly take his place in the 
American intelligence system, not only militarizing it, but Nazifying it as well. 




Gehlen Makes his Move 



Gehlen had been on the mountain for exactly three weeks and the war had been over 
for almost two weeks when he decided on May 19 that it was time to make contact. He 
left the three women and the two wounded men at Misery Meadow and with his four 
aides began the decent to the valley town of Fischhausen on Lake Schliersee. 

On the same day Soviet commissioners far to the north at Flensburg demanded that the 
United States hand over Gehlen as well as his files on the USSR. This was the first the 
U.S. command had heard of Gehlen. 36 Gehlen and company took their time, staying 
three days with the parents of one of his aides and communicating by radio with those 
who had remained at Misery Meadow. 

On May 22, Gehlen at last decided the moment was right. He and his aides marched 
into the Army command center and represented themselves to the desk officer, a 
Captain John Schwarzwalder, to whom Gehlen spoke his prepared speech: 

"I am head of the Section Foreign Armies East in German Army headquarters. I have 
information to give of the highest importance to your government." 

Schwarzwalder had Gehlen and his group jeeped to Miesbach where there was a[n] 
OSS detachment. There Gehlen once again gave his speech, this time to a Captain 
Marian Porter: "I have information of the greatest importance for your supreme 
commander." 

Porter replied, "So have they all," and shunted him and his cohorts off to the prison 
camp at Salzburg. Gehlen's disappointment at this reception was keen and his 
biographers all say he never forgot it, "lapsing," as one puts it, "into near despair" as he 
"presented the strange paradox of a spy-master thirsting for recognition by his 
captors. "37 

Recognition was inevitable, however, since the CIC was trying to find him. By mid June 
at the latest, his name was recognized by a G-2 officer, Colonel William H. Quinn, who 
had Gehlen brought to Augsburg for his first serious interrogation. Quinn was the first 
American to whom Gehlen presented his proposal and told of his staff dispersed at 
several camps in the mountains as well as the precious buried archives of the FHO. 

Unlike Captain Porter, Colonel Quinn was impressed. He promptly passed Gehlen up 
the command chain to General Edwin L. Sibert. Sibert later recalled, "I had a most 
excellent impression of him at once." Gehlen immediately began educating him as to 
the actual aims of the Soviet Union and its display of military might." As Sibert told a 
journalist years later, "With her present armed forces potential, he [Gehlen] continued, 
Russia could risk war with the West and the aim of such a war would be the occupation 
of West Germany."38 

Acting without orders, Sibert listened to Gehlen for several days before informing 
Eisenhower's chief of staff, General Walter Bedell Smith. 39 Smith and Sibert then 




continued to develop their relationship with Gehlen secretly, choosing not to burden 
Eisenhower with knowledge of what they were doing "in order not to compromise him in 
his relations with the Soviets. "40 

Eisenhower in fact had strictly forbidden U.S. fraternization with Germans. Gehlen was 
encouraged to resume contact with his FHO comrades who were still at large in 
Bavaria, releasing them from their vow of silence. Gehlen was sufficiently confident of 
his American relationships by this time that he dug up his buried files and, in special 
camps, put his FHO experts to work preparing detailed reports on the Red Army for his 
American captors. 

Well before the end of June he and his comrades were "discharged from prisoner of war 
status so that we could move around at will. "42 They were encouraged to form a unit 
termed a "general staff cell" first within G-2's Historical Research Section, then later in 
the Seventh Army's Intelligence Center in Wiesbaden, where they worked in private 
quarters and were treated as VIPs. 43 

Indeed, a partly declassified CIA document recapitulated this story in the early 1970s, 
noting at this time: 

Gehlen met with Admiral Karl Dognitz, who had been appointed by Hitler as his 
successor during the last days of the Third Reich. Gehlen and the Admiral were now in 
a U.S. Army VIP prison camp in Wiesbaden; Gehlen sought and received approval from 
Doenitz too!44 

In other words, the German chain of command was still in effect, and it approved of 
what Gehlen was doing with the Americans. Gehlen's biographers are under the 
impression that it took six weeks for someone in European G-2 to notice and recognize 
Gehlen in the POW cage, that Sibert did not tell Smith about finding him until the middle 
of August, and that it was much later still before Sibert and Smith conspired to 
circumvent Eisenhower to communicate their excitement about Gehlen to someone at 
the Pentagon presumably associated with the Joint Chiefs of Staff.45 But documents 
released in the 1980s show that this part of Gehlen's story raced along much more 
quickly. Already on June 29, in fact, the Pentagon had informed Eisenhower's European 
command that the War Department wanted to see Gehlen in Washington. 46 

It was a fast time. By no later than August 22, one of Gehlen's top associates, Hermann 
Baum was forming what would become the intelligence and counterintelligence sections 
of Gehlen's new organization. Gehlen himself, with retinue, was departing for 
Washington in General Bedell Smith's DC-3 for high-level talks with American military 
and intelligence officials. And the whole concept of the deal he was about to offer his 
conquerors had been approved by a Nazi chain of command that was still functioning 
despite what the world thought and still does think was the Nazis' unconditional 
surrender.47 




Gehlen arrived in Washington on August 24 with six of his top FHO aides and technical 
experts in tow. 48 World War II had been over about a week, the war in Europe about 
three and a half months. 

The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt 

As Gehlen and his six men were en route from Germany to Washington, Donovan's 
OSS troubles became critical. On August 23, Admiral William Leahy, chief of the JCS, 
the President's national security adviser and a man who despised Donovan, advised 
Truman to order his budget director Harold Smith to begin a study of the intelligence 
question. Stating: "this country wanted no Gestapo under any guise or for any 
reason. "49 Truman may not have known that the Gestapo's Odessa heirs were landing 
in the lap of the Pentagon even as he spoke. Smith in any case responded to Truman's 
directive by asking Donovan for his OSS demobilization plans. Now, too late,. Donovan 
tried to fight. 

The Gehlen party, "Group 6," was checking out its very comfortable accommodations at 
Fort Hunt at the very moment at which Donovan, writing from a borrowed Washington 
office, fired back a memo to Smith defending the OSS and its right to live: “Among these 
assets [of the OSS] was establishment for the first time in our nation's history of a 
foreign secret intelligence service which reported information as seen through American 
eyes. As an integral and inseparable part of this service, there is a group of specialists 
to analyze and evaluate the material for presentation to those who determine national 
policy."50 

Much more significant than the question of the adequacy of U.S. intelligence on the 
Soviet Union, however, was the question of civilian versus military control of the 
intelligence mission. Germany and England had fought this battle in the 19th century, 
the military capturing the intelligence role in Germany and the civilians maintaining a 
position in England. Throughout the summer and fall of 1945, this same battle raged in 
the U.S. government. 51 The battle for intelligence control was indeed the background 
for the arrival of Gehlen and his six aides at Fort Hunt, where Gehlen's party was 
housed and Gehlen himself provided with an NCO butler and several white-jacket 
orderlies. 52 

A momentous relationship was established at Fort Hunt, one that had the profoundest 
effects on the subsequent evolution of United States foreign policy during an 
exceptionally difficult passage of world history. The period of the Cold War as a whole, 
and more especially its early, formative years - from Gehlen's coming aboard the 
American intelligence service until he rejoined the West German republic in 1955 -- was 
laden with the peril of nuclear war. On at least one occasion, in 1948,53 Gehlen almost 
convinced the United States that the Soviet Union was about to launch a war against 
the West and that it would be in the U.S. interest to preempt it. 

Clearly it is important to know who made and authorized the decisions that led to our 
national dependency on a network of underground Nazis, yet because the relevant 



documents are still classified this central part of the Gehlen story still cannot be 
reconstructed. 

From the handful of published books about the Gehlen affair (none of which cite their 
sources on this point) we can list only seven Americans who were said to be involved 
with Gehlen at Fort Hunt: Admiral William D. Leahy, chief of staff end Truman's national 
security advisor. Allen Dulles, OSS station chief in Bern during the war. Sherman Kent, 
head of OSS Research and Analysis Branch and a Yale historian. General George V. 
Strong, head of Army G-2. Major General Alex H. Bolling of G-2. Brigadier General 
John T. Magruder, first head of the Army's Strategic Services Unit, a vulture of OSS. 
Loftus E. Becker, a lawyer assc. with G-2 and the Nuremberg war-crimes operation; the 
CIA's first deputy director. 

We do not know if these people were involved as a committee, if they talked with 
Gehlen and his six aides a lot or a little, separately or all at once, or if they sent their 
own aides to work out the details. We do not know how a POW-interrogation was 
transformed into a bargaining process. Above all, we do not know what kind of 
communication the U.S. participants in the Fort Hunt-Gehlen talks had with the political 
authorities to whom they were responsible. Leahy is the only one who had obvious 
contact with President Truman. But there is nothing in the revealed record to indicate 
that he ever discussed Gehlen or the Fort Hunt deal with Truman, or took the least 
trouble to explain to Truman the implications of hiring a Nazi spy network. We have no 
idea, for that matter, how Leahy himself saw it. 

What we do know is the outlines of the Gehlen deal itself, however it was hammered out 
and however it was or was not ratified by legal, political authority. That is because 
Gehlen himself laid out its terms in his autobiography, The Service. Gehlen says in this 
work (which has been attacked for its inaccuracies) that the discussion ended with "a 
gentleman's agreement," that the terms of his relationship with the United States were 
"for a variety of reasons never set down in black and white." He continues, "Such was 
the element of trust that had been built up between the two sides during this year of 
intensive personal contact that neither had the slightest hesitation in founding the entire 
operation on a verbal agreement and a handshake. "54 

According Gehlen, this agreement consisted of the following six basic points. His 
language is worth savoring. "I remember the terms of the agreement well," he wrote: 

"1. A clandestine German intelligence organization was to be set up. using the existing 
potential to continue information gathering in the East just as we had been doing before. 
The basis for this was our common interest in a defense against communism." 

"2. This German organization was to work not 'for' or 'under' the Americans, but 'jointly 
with the Americans." 

"3. The organization would operate exclusively under German leadership, which would 
receive its directives and assignments from the Americans until a new government was 
established in Germany." 

"4. The organization was to be financed by the Americans with funds which were not to 
be part of the occupation costs, and in return the organization would supply all its 




intelligence reports to the Americans." (The Gehlen Organization's first annual budget is 
said have been $3.4 million. 55)" 

"5. As soon as a sovereign German government was established, that government 
should decide whether the organization should continue to function or not. But that until 
such time the care and control (later referred to as 'the trusteeship') of the organization 
would remain in American hands." 

"6. Should the organization at any time find itself in a position where the American and 
German interests diverged, it was accepted that the organization would consider the 
interests of Germany first. "56 

Gehlen acknowledges that the last point especially might "raise some eyebrows" and 
make some think that the U.S. side "had gone overboard in making concessions to us." 
He assures his readers that actually "this point demonstrates better than any other 
Sibert's great vision: he recognized that for many years to come the interests of the 
United States and West Germany must run parallel. "57 

Gehlen and his staff left Fort Hunt for Germany on July 1, 1946, having been in the 
United States for almost a year. They were temporarily based at Oberursel then settled 
into a permanent base in a walled-in, self-contained village at Pullach near Munich. 
Gehlen set up his headquarters in an estate originally built by Martin Bormann.58 

There a start-up group of 50 began to turn the "gentlemen's agreement" of Fort Hunt 
into reality. The first order of business being staff, Gehlen's recruiters were soon 
circulating among the "unemployed mass" of "former" Nazi SS men, the Odessa 
constituency, to find more evaluators, couriers and informers. 59 Gehlen had "solemnly 
promised in Washington not to employ SS and Gestapo men, "60 although it will be 
noted that Gehlen includes no such provision in his list of terms. There is not the least 
question that he did recruit such men, supplying them with new names when necessary. 
Two of the worst of them were Franz Six and Emil Augsburg. Six was a key Nazi 
intellectual, and both Six and Augsburg were associated with the Wannsee Institute, the 
Nazi think-tank in Berlin where SS leader Reinhard Heydrich, in January 1942, 
announced "the Final Solution to the Jewish Question." Both of them had commanded 
extermination squads roving in East Europe in pursuit of Jews and communists, and 
both had gone underground with the Odessa when the Third Reich crumbled. Augsburg 
hid in Italy, then returned in disguise when Gehlen called. Six was actually captured 
by Allied intelligence, tried at Nuremberg and imprisoned, only to be sprung to work with 
Augsburg running Gehlen's networks of East European Nazis. 61 

From the edge of total defeat Gehlen now moved into his vintage years, more powerful, 
influential and independent than he had been even in the heyday of the Third Reich. 
Minimally supervised first by the War Department's Strategic Services Unit under Fort 
Hunt figure Major General John Magruder, and then by the SSU's follow-on 
organization, the Central Intelligence Group under Rear Admiral Sidney Souers,62 the 
Org grew to dominate the entire West German intelligence service. Through his close 
ties to Chancellor Konrad Adenauer's chief minister, Hans Globke, Gehlen was able to 
place his men in positions of control in West Germany's military intelligence and the 




internal counterintelligence arm. When NATO was established he came to dominate it 
too. By one estimate "some 70 percent" of the total intelligence take flowing into 
NATO'S military committee and Allied headquarters (SHAPE) on the Soviet Union, the 
countries of East Europe, the rest of Europe, and indeed the rest of the world was 
generated at Pullach.63 

Not even the establishment of the CIA in 1947 and the official transfer of the Pullach 
operation into the West German government in 1955 (when it was retitled the Federal 
Intelligence Service, BND) lessened the reliance of American intelligence on Gehlen's 
product.64 From the beginning days of the Cold War through the 1970s and beyond, 
the United State's, West Germany's, and NATO's most positive beliefs about the nature 
and intentions of the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact, and world communism would be 
supplied by an international network of utterly unreconstructed SS Nazis whose primary 
purposes were to cover the escape of the Odessa and make the world safe for Naziism. 

The Cost of the Fort Hunt Treaty 

Gehlen's story has many branchings beyond this point. These include several spy 
scandals that exposed his operation as dangerously vulnerable to Soviet penetration. 
They include the pitiful spectacle of U.S. CIC agents pursuing Nazi fugitives on war- 
crimes charges only to see them summarily pardoned and hired by Gehlen. They 
include the dark saga of Klaus Barbie, the SS "Butcher of Lyon" who worked with the 
Gehlen Organization and boasted of being a member of the Odessa. They include 
assets of Operation Paperclip, in which right-wing forces in the U.S. military once again 
savaged the concept of de-Nazification in order to smuggle scores of SS rocket 
scientists into the United States. They include continuation of the civilian-vs. -military 
conflict over the institution of secret intelligence and the question of politically motivated 
covert action within the domestic interior. They include above all the story of the 
enormous victory of the Odessa in planting powerful Nazi colonies around the world -- in 
such countries as South Africa where the enactment of apartheid laws followed; or 
several countries in Latin America that then became breeding grounds for the Death 
Squads of the current day; and indeed even in the United States where it now appears 
that thousands of wanted Nazis were able to escape justice and grow old in peace. 

In making the Gehlen deal, the United States did not acquire for itself an intelligence 
service. That is not what the Gehlen group was or was trying to be. The military 
intelligence historian Colonel William Corson put it most succinctly, "Gehlen's 
organization was designed to protect the Odessa Nazis. It amounts to an exceptionally 
well-orchestrated diversion. "65 The only intelligence provided by the Gehlen net to the 
United States was intelligence selected specifically to worsen East-West tensions and 
increase the possibility of military conflict between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. It was 
exactly as the right-wing pairs had warned in 1945 when they were aroused by 
Donovan's proposal for a permanent intelligence corps, warning their readers that a 
"super spy unit" could "determine American foreign policy by weeding out, withholding 
or coloring information gathered at his direction. "66 It was exactly as Truman had 
warned when he demobilized the OSS with the observation that the U.S. had no interest 




in "Gestapolike measures." The fact that this lively concern for a police-state apparatus 
should have been focused on the relatively innocuous OSS while at the same time the 
red carpet was being rolled out for Gehlen's gang of SS men must surely count as one 
of the supreme wrenching ironies of the modern period. 

Another dimension of the cost the Gehlen deal is the stress it induced within American 
institutions, weakening them incalculably. The Gehlen Organization was the antithesis 
of the Allied cause, its sinister emergence on the scene of post-war Europe the very 
opposite of what the western democracies thought they had been fighting for. 

Perhaps at least we can say that, despite Gehlen and despite the military, the United 
States did after all finally wind up with a civilian intelligence service. The National 
Security Act of 1947 did embody Donovan's central point in creating a CIA outside the 
military. But in fact the Gehlen Org substantially pre-empted the CIA's civilian character 
before it was ever born. The CIA was born to be rocked in Gehlen's cradle. It remained 
dependent on the Org even when the Org turned into the BND. Thus, whatever the CIA 
was from the standpoint of the law, it remained from the standpoint of practical 
intelligence collection a front for a house of Nazi spies. 

The Org was not merely military, which is bad, not merely foreign, which is much worse, 
and not merely Nazi, which is intolerable; it was not even professionally committed to 
the security of the U.S. and Western Europe. It was committed exclusively to the 
security of the Odessa. All the Gehlen Org ever wanted the U.S. to be was anti- 
communist, the more militantly so the better. It never cared in the least for the security 
of the United States, its Constitution or its democratic tradition. 

It is not the point of this essay that there would have been no Cold War if the Odessa 
had not wanted it and had not been able, through the naive collaboration of the 
American military Right to place Gehlen and his network in a position that ought to have 
been occupied by a descendant of the OSS. But it was precisely because the world was 
so volatile and confusing as of the transition from World War II to peacetime that the 
U.S. needed to see it, as Donovan put it in his plaintive appeal to Truman in the summer 
of 1945, "through American eyes." No Nazi eyes, however bright, could see it for us 
without deceiving us and leading us to the betrayal of our own national character. 
Second, there was no way to avoid the Cold War once we had taken the desperate step 
of opening our doors to Gehlen. From that moment on, from the summer of 1945 when 
the Army brought him into the United States and made a secret deal with him, the Cold 
War was locked in. 

A number of Cold War historians on the left (for example D.F. Fleming and Gabriel 
Kolko) have made cogent arguments that from the Soviet point of view the Cold War 
was thrust upon us by an irrational and belligerent Stalin. The story of the secret treaty 
of Fort Hunt exposes this "history" as a self-serving political illusion. On the contrary, the 
war in the Pacific was still raging and the United States was still trying to get the Soviet 
Union into the war against Japan when General Sibert was already deep into his 
relation ship with Gehlen. 




The key point that comes crashing through the practical and moral confusion about this 
matter, once one sees that Gehlen's Organization was an arm of the Odessa, is that, 
whether it was ethical or not, the U.S. did not pick up a Gift Horse in Gehlen at all; it 
picked up a Trojan Horse. 

The unconditional surrender the Germans made to the Allied command at the little red 
schoolhouse in Reims was the surrender only of the German armed services. It was not 
the surrender of the hard SS core of the Nazi Party. The SS did not surrender, 
unconditionally or otherwise, and thus Nazism itself did not surrender. The SS chose 
rather, to seek other means of continuing the war while the right wing of the United 
States military establishment, through fears and secret passions and a naivete of its 
own, chose to facilitate that choice. The history that we have lived through since then 
stands witness to the consequences. 

References: 

Carl Oglesby is the author of several books, notably The Yankee and Cowboy War. He 
has published a variety of articles on political themes. In 1965 he was the President of 
Students for a Democratic Society. He is the director of The Institute for Continuing de- 
nazification. For information on the Institute write to: 294 Harvard Street, #3, 
Cambridge. MA 02139. 

William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (New York: Simon & Schuster, 
1960), p. 1140. Ibid., p. 1033 fn. Enunciation of this policy surprised and upset some 
U.S. military leaders who feared it would prolong the war. See, for example, William R. 
Corson (USMC ret.), The Armies of Ignorance: The Rite of the American Intelligence 
Empire (New York: Dial Press, 1977), pp. 8-10. William Stevenson, The Bormann 
Brotherhood: A New Investigation of the Escape and Survival of Nazi War Criminals 
(New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973). Op. cit. n. 1, p. 1072. Ibid., pp. 1091-92 

This discussion of Bormann's strategy is based mainly on Glenn B. Infield, Skorzeny: 
Hitler's Commando (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1981); and op. cit., n. 3. My 
summary of the Nazi survival plan is based on op. cit., n. 3; Infield, op. cit., n. 6; 
Ladislas Farago, Aftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich (New York: Simon & 
Schuster, 1974); Charles Higham, American Swastika (New York: Doubleday, 1985); 
Brian Bunting, The Rise of the South African Reich (New York: Penguin, 1964); and 
Simon Wiesenthal, The Murderers Among Us (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967). On "neo- 
Nazi" colonies in the Near and Middle East and South America, see Wiesenthal, pp. 78- 
95. Infield, op. cit., n. 6. p. 192. Ibid., p. 179; and Wiesenthal, op. cit., n. 7. pp. 87-88. 
Wiesenthal, op. cit., n. 7, p. 88. Also quoted in Infield, op. cit., n. 6, p. 183. Infield, op. 
cit., n. 6, p. 183. 

Schacht, who had lost favor with Hitler in 1938, was acquitted of war-crimes charges by 
the Nuremberg Tribunal. He was later convicted of being a "chief Nazi offender" by the 
German de-Nazification court at Baden-Wurttemberg, but his conviction was overturned 
and his eight-year sentence lifted on September 2, 1 948. Infield, op cit., n. 6. 

Infield, op cit., n. 6, p. 16. 




Heinz Hohne and Hermann Zoliing, The General Was A Spy (New York: Richard Barry, 
Coward McCann & Geoghegan, 1973), p. 54; and E.H. Cookridge, Gehlen, Spy of the 
Century (New York: Random House, 1971), p. 120. Christopher Simpson, Blowback 
(New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988), p. 160 ff. Simpson's is the best book on 
the Gehlen matter so far published. 

Ibid., pp. 254-55. 

Ibid., pp. 180, 193. 

Ibid., pp. 10, 207-08. 

Ibid., pp. 18-22. Also see Hohne and Zoliing, op. 

cit., n. 14, pp. 35-37; Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, pp. 56-58. 

Cookridge op. cit., n. 14, p. 79. Reinhard Gehlen, The Service (New York: World, 
1972), ' 
p. 99. 

Ibid., p. 107. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, pp. 103, 106. 

I do not know of an estimate of the size of the Foreign Armies East (FHO) as of the end 
of the war. Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 161, says that by 1948, when the Gehlen 
Organization was probably back up to war-time speed, its key agents "exceeded four 
thousand." Each agent typically ran a net of about six informants, Cookridge, op. cit., n. 
14, p. 167. Thus, the total Gehlen net might have numbered in the range of 20,000 
individuals 

Op. cit., n. 21 , p. 1 15. 

Corson, op. cit., n. 2, pp. 6, 20; Anthony Cave Brown, 

The Last Hero, Wild Bill Donovan (N.Y.: Vintage Books, 

1982), p. 625; U.S. Senate, "Final Report of the Select Committee to Study 
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities," Book IV, 
Supplementary Staff Reports on Foreign and Military Intelligence (known as, The 
Church Report), p. 5. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p.130. 

Brown, op. cit., n. 26, p. 626. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 131. 

William M. Leary, ed., The Central Intelligence Agency: History and Documents 
(Atlanta: University of Atlanta Press, 1984), pp. 123-25; Corson, op cit., n. 

2, pp. 214-17; Brown, op. cit., n. 26, p. 625. 

Brown, op. cit., n. 26, p. 627. 

Ibid., p. 170. 

Thomas Powers, The Man Who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA (New 
York: Pocket Books, 1 981 ), p. 31 . 

Ibid. 

Brown, op. cit., n. 26, p. 744. 

This account of Gehlen’s surrender is based on Hohne and Zoliing, op. cit., n. 14, pp. 
52-56; Cookridge, op cit., n. 14, pp. 118-21; op. cit., 3, pp. 89-90; op cit., n. 15, pp. 41- 
43; and the BBC documentary, Superspy: The Story of Reinhard Gehlen, 1974. There 
are many trivial discrepancies in these four accounts but they are in perfect agreement 
as to the main thrust. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 120. 




Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 58. 

As to breaking orders, Gehlen is effusive in his praise of "Sibert's great vision.... I stand 
in admiration of Sibert as a general who this this bold step -- in a situation fraught with 
political pitfalls -- of taking over the intelligence experts of a former enemy for his own 
country.... The political risk to which Sibert was exposed was very great. Anti-German 
feeling was running high, and he had created our organizations without any authority 
from Washington and without the knowledge of the War Department." Op. cit., n. 21, p. 
123. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 58. 

Ibid., pp. 58-59. 

Op. cit., n. 21 , p. 120. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 58. 

Undated CIA fragment with head, "Recent Books," apparently published circa 1972, 
partly declassified and released in 1986 in response to a Freedom of Information (FOIA) 
suit. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, pp. 56, 58-59. 

U.S. Army document SHAEF D-95096, September 15, 1946, declassified FOIA release. 
The routing of this cable through SHAEF HQ raises a question as to whether 
Eisenhower was really kept in the dark about Gehlen. As Gehlen was about to leave for 
the United States, he left a message for Baun with another of his top aides, Gerhard 
Wessel: "I am to tell you from Gehlen that he has discussed with [Hitler's successor 
Admiral Karl] Doenitz and [Gehlen's superior and chief of staff General Franz] Haider 
the question of continuing his work with the Americans. Both were in agreement." 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 61. 

There is variance in the literature concerning how many assistants Gehlen took with him 
to Washington. John Ranelagh, The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA (New 
York: Simon and Schuster, 1986), p. 92; Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 125; and op. cit., 
n. 15, p. 42, say it was three while Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 61, say four. A 
U.S. Army note of August 28, 1945 (a 1986 FOIA release) refers to "the 7 shipped by air 
last week" and that no doubt is the correct number. Another FOIA release, an 
unnumbered Military Intelligence Division document dated September 30, 1945, 
originated at Fort Hunt, labels the Gehlen party as "Group 6" and names seven 
members: Gehlen, Major Alberg Schoeller, Major Horst Hiemenz, Colonel Heinz Herre, 
Colonel Konrad Stephanus, and two others whose rank is not given, Franz Hinrichs and 
Herbert Feukner. The number is important for what it says about the nature of Gehlen's 
trip, Three might be thought of as co-defendants but six constitute a staff. Cookridge, 
op. cit., n. 14, p. 125, says Gehlen made the trip disguised in the uniform of a one-star 
American general, his aides disguised as U.S. captains. Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 
14, pp. 60-61, inflate the rank to two stars but then call the story spurious. Gehlen's 
memoir says nothing about it. 

Corson, op. cit., n. 2, p. 239. 

Ibid., p. 240. 

Ranelagh, op. cit., n. 48, p. 102ff. 

BBC documentary, Superspy, op. cit., n. 36. Corson, in an interview with the author, 
said the butler and the orderlies must have been CIC agents. Still, the detail rankles. 
Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, 203; op. cit., n. 15. p. 




1 36. Op. cit., n. 21 , p. 1 21 . Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 1 4. p. 64, say that the details 
of this "gentlemen's agreement" were put into writing by the CIA in 1949. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 65. 

Op. cit., n. 21 , p. 122. 

Ibid., pp. 122-23. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 119; Cookridge, 
op. cit., n. 14, p. 155, BBC documentary, Superspy, 
op. cit., n. 36. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 67. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 144. 

Op. cit., n. 15, pp. 17, 46-47, 166, 225; Cookridge, 
op. cit., n. 14, pp. 242-43. 

Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., n. 14, p. 133. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 218. 

Ibid., p. 128. 

Author's interview with Corson, May, 1986. 

Cookridge, op. cit., n. 14, p. 131. 

(This article was originally from CovertAction Information Bulletin, Fall, 1990) 

NOTE: PREVAILING WINDS RESEARCH fully endorses the work of CovertAction 
Information Bulletin and we urge all of our readers to subscribe to this extraordinarily 
valuable magazine. Subscriptions are available from CovertAction, P.O. Box 34583, 
Washington, D.C., 20043)